Re: Re: A better tuba?


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by GC on December 21, 2001 at 22:14:12:

In Reply to: Re: A better tuba? posted by Chuck(G) on December 21, 2001 at 21:18:39:

A. ceramic pistons would abrade
B. titanium is too expensive and too hard to work easily into tubes
C. stainless steel absorbs too much of the brilliance of tone; see the recent postings on Mr. Schilke's monograph
D. the bell on the other side would screw up the balance, make it harder to hear, and would be even more damage-prone
E. Palladium? Go whole hog and try depleted uranium.


Follow Ups: