Re: Re: Cerveny F tuba


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Then Again on January 24, 2001 at 09:31:24:

In Reply to: Re: Cerveny F tuba posted by Lew on January 24, 2001 at 09:11:00:

I checked the Cerveny and the UMI web sites and the 92J looks to be a 651, not a 653.


Follow Ups: