Re: Re: Re: 4 valve vs compensating euph


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Chuck(G) on January 24, 2001 at 14:08:43:

In Reply to: Re: Re: 4 valve vs compensating euph posted by Rick Denney on January 24, 2001 at 13:47:38:

I've seen the pics of the York double--must weigh a ton. And let's not forget the currently-produced Gronitz doubles (CC/F and BBb/F). Just never seen a euph done up as one. One case where rotaries make a lot of sense.

But the low side of a double euph would be the same as an F tuba, nein? So it would be in F, not f. Ummm, that'd be F2?

Chuck "(F)frankly my dear..." Guzis



Follow Ups: