Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bell modification


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by the demento on November 05, 2003 at 18:18:13:

In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bell modification posted by Art H on November 05, 2003 at 00:39:17:

Actually the intonation is better. Projection and overall volume are quite a bit lower without any thing stuffed in or about the tube. I figure that the cylindrical termination is a lot easier to tune than the stock bell with the complex dynamics introduced by the huge flare. I'm not claiming any miracle solution to much of anything here- and of course the expected 1,2,3 sharp ETC, but the basic intonation is pretty good. I'm not exactly going to garner a lot of support for style though.


Follow Ups: