Re: 3 piston + 1 rotor


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Christopher on May 27, 1999 at 13:39:39:

In Reply to: 3 piston + 1 rotor posted by Jon on May 27, 1999 at 12:09:56:

Why would it be? The whole opposable thumb thing makes 5 pistons impractical, so 4+1 is the present solution. But until we develop opposable index fingers, there's no point in a 3+1 configuration.

Is there an advantage to mixing rotors and pistons that I am missing? Or were you just musing?


Follow Ups: