Re: Strike Votes _vs_ mgmt -vs- union-bustin


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ TubeNet BBS ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Frank Rosenau on September 12, 2000 at 01:40:49:

In Reply to: Strike Votes _vs_ mgmt -vs- union-bustin posted by Concerned in CA on September 11, 2000 at 12:04:19:

This has become something of a discussion about the value of unions, so I'm a-gonna throw in my one cent.
When the Musician's Union re-established itself in Modesto, CA some years back, I decided, even though I am ONLY an amateur - as a show of support - to join for 5 years, because:
On my day job (non-union) as a troubleshooter for an international corporation I get:
Free medical and dental for myself, plus a very small cost to include my family.
Company paid retirement.
401K with company match.
5 weeks paid vacation per year....and a lot of other stuff.
Without a union, what does the journeyman musician get - especially if you freelance from gig to gig?
NONE OF THE ABOVE. NADA. ZILCH.
Plus I got stiffed on a couple of non-union contract protected gigs.
Not to say that the union (or unions) in general don't have their problems, but I think that the musician's union in particular provides some very significant essential services for professional musicians
Anyway, that's my opinion and worth every penny you've paid to read it.



Follow Ups: